The challenges of financing retirement change dramatically
on the day you retire.
You may imagine that retiring with adequate savings one day
will feel like winning. But you’re really just taking a lead into the locker
room at halftime. In reality, the game will have changed and the challenges
will be even greater in many ways when you return to the court for the second
half. The goal shifts from accumulating a pile of money to making a pile of
money last.
It’s a different game.
We refer to the period before retirement as the accumulation phase because our goal is
to accumulate enough wealth to maintain our pre-retirement standard of living
after we retire and the paychecks end. We call the period after retiring the
decumulation, or spending phase
because our objective then becomes stretching out our wealth to pay our bills
for the rest of our lives.
The accumulation environment is very different than the
spending environment. Here are some of the important characteristics of
accumulation:
·
We have jobs and paychecks that cover our living
expenses. The paychecks arrive, for the most part, during both bull and bear
markets. A temporary loss in the stock market may not affect our spending at
all.
·
We hopefully have some money left over to save
in a retirement account and to increase its value.
·
We can take some risk with our investments,
because we don’t need that money to live on (yet) and that generally means we can
earn a higher return.
·
Our investment returns apply to a growing base
of capital as our wealth grows. When we are 30, we might earn 8% a year on a
$20,000 portfolio, or $1,600. When we are 60, we might earn that same 8% on a
portfolio of $500,000, yielding $40,000.
·
Dollar Cost
Averaging (investing the same amount of money every year) allows us to buy
stocks at lower prices over time.
·
We could lose our entire retirement savings portfolio and possibly have time to rebuild it before we retire.
·
We may have health insurance paid for by our
employer.
Here are some important characteristics of the spending phase:
·
No more paychecks. Expenses are paid from our
savings.
·
No more savings contributions. Our portfolio
increases only when our investments do well.
·
We need to reduce investment risk, because we no
longer have paychecks to bail us out during bear markets. That generally means
a lower return on our investments. We might expect a 6% portfolio return
instead of 8%, for example.
·
Our investment returns apply to a shrinking base
of capital as our portfolio is being depleted. Even if we earned 8% every year,
it would return 8% of a (probably) smaller number every year.
·
Dollar Cost Averaging works in reverse. We spend
roughly the same amount every year so we sell more stocks at lower prices and
fewer stocks at higher prices.
·
We pay for health insurance out of our own
pockets. It is very expensive.
·
Since we are no longer working, when the
retirement savings is gone, it’s gone.
·
On the positive side, we no longer pay FICA
taxes and no longer need to save for retirement.
If accumulation is like sailing a boat with fair winds and a
following sea, as they say, with plenty of fuel for the engine if the winds die
down, then investing in the spending phase is like pounding into the current
with strong headwinds in a boat that’s growing heavier as it takes on water and
has spent its fuel reserves.
During the accumulation phase, you’re contributing to
savings and not spending from savings. In the spending phase, you’re doing the
reverse. And probably earning a lower return to boot.
A retiree spending 4% of her savings each year adjusted for
inflation has to earn 4% plus the
rate of inflation plus the cost of
taxes and commissions on her investments just for her portfolio to break even
that year.
Let’s say John has a portfolio worth $100,000. His
investments return 8% one year and inflation runs 3% for an inflation-adjusted
rate of return of 4.85%. (This example is in constant dollars.)
This younger John contributes $4,000 at the first of the
year to his 401(k) account. Before
retirement, his portfolio increases to $104,854 plus $4,000 of new savings for
a new value of $108,854.
Because John’s portfolio is growing, a 4.85%
inflation-adjusted return next year will provide an additional $5,284 of real
value (4.85% of $108,854).
If this scenario occurs after retirement, the older John
still earns $4,850 in the market, but his portfolio shrinks a bit from spending
$4,000. He is no longer contributing to his 401(k), so his portfolio value ends the year at $100,854.
Because older John’s portfolio is shrinking in the spending
phase, an 8% return next year with 3% annual inflation will provide only $4,896
of real value, 7.4% less than younger John’s portfolio would earn.
And so it goes, on and on.
There is a larger message here than “investing is really tough
after you retire” that I will address in my next post. It’s about the amount of
risk you can actually handle after you retire, because it will be much harder
to recover from large portfolio losses.
I used a sailboat analogy to describe the difference between
accumulation and spending phase economics, but having just finished my eighth
year of retirement and surviving the 2008 market crash, the real estate crash, seventeen
grand a year for family health insurance, two kids still in college and a third
in med school, I can think of a more visceral analogy for how investment feels after you retire.
Remember when you were a kid sledding on a hilly street of
packed snow and near the bottom, at top speed, your runners ran into a patch of
dry pavement?
Yeah, sort of like that.
No comments:
Post a Comment